A- de 2010
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez
✓Claimant Sara Isabel Garcia Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- No es oportunidad para corregir o modificar demanda rechazada
- Demandante debe efectuar razonamiento mínimo para constatar yerro o arbitrariedad
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica presentado contra el auto proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio, que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.
La Sala recuerda que el recurso de súplica no es el escenario para realizar la corrección de la demanda, por lo tanto se decide confirmar el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
- RESUELVE:
- CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del veinticinco (25) de noviembre de dos mil nueve (2009), proferido por el despacho del magistrado Jorge Ivan Palacio Palacio, que rechazo la demanda presentada por la ciudadana Sara Isabel Garcia Renneberg y otros contra el articulo 230 de la Ley 599 de 2000.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.